Anton Chekhov vs Matteo Covato Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Jul at 09:44 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Chekhov vs M. Covato

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Chekhov 1 - 0 Covato
They have played 3 sets in total, with Anton Chekhov winning 2 and Matteo Covato winning 1. The last match between Anton Chekhov and Matteo Covato was at the M15 Hillcrest, 15-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Anton Chekhov getting the victory 3-6 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chekhov | 1 |
| Covato | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Hillcrest(07-15-25)
A. Chekhov vs M. Covato H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 44.86% (96-118) | Career Total W/L | 36.63% (37-64) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Chekhov vs M. Covato Match Preview:
- Chekhov has a lower win percentage on second serve, at 38.89%, compared to Covato's 46.9%. Could this be an advantage for Covato?
- In return games, Chekhov has the edge, winning 50.19% of their opponent's second serve points against Covato's 44.33%.
- Both players have similar stats for first serve returns, with Chekhov at 23.08% and Covato slightly ahead at 23.4%.
- Under pressure, Covato has saved 56% of breakpoints, just slightly outperforming Chekhov's 55.1%.
- In overall performance, Chekhov has a higher win rate over the past year (63.16%) than Covato (46.3%).
- Chekhov's best surface is Hard, winning 49% of matches, unlike Covato who excels on Clay with a win percentage of 51%.
- In terms of opponent quality, Chekhov faces tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 139.16 versus Covato's 193.56.
- Covato outperforms Chekhov in deciding sets, winning 67% compared to Chekhov's 50% win rate.
- Chekhov demonstrates higher breakpoint conversion rates at 34.04%, while Covato manages only 16%.
Editorial Prediction (July 15, 2025, UTC):
As Chekhov and Covato prepare to face off, pattern analysis shows each player's distinct qualities emerging strongly. Covato's second serve proves slightly more effective, a crucial factor considering Chekhov's formidable return game.
Interestingly, even with the pressure on, Covato displays slightly superior breakpoint resilience. However, Chekhov is markedly proficient at converting him, offering a possible critical advantage.
Examining surfaces, this event favors Chekhov as matches are played on Hard courts, where Chekhov feels more at ease. Looking at their opposition strength, Chekhov has regularly faced stronger opponents, a testament to his higher competition level readiness.
Despite Covato's horn-honking in deciding sets, Chekhov's comprehensive match history, amassed in arduous contests, sets him as the preferred winner for this clash.
Based on these detailed assessments, Chekhov appears better positioned to claim victory in this upcoming tennis match.
Anton Chekhov vs Matteo Covato Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Chekhov vs M. Covato H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 14 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:51:13 | Average Match Time | 2:51:13 |
| 70% (74/105) | 1st Serve % | 64% (63/99) |
| 62% (46/74) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (42/63) |
| 52% (16/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (15/36) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 42% (42/99) | Return Points Win % | 41% (43/105) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Chekhov Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 4-6 6-1 10-6 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
M. Covato Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(6) | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||

A. Chekhov vs M. Covato Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44.86% (96/118) | YTD Win/Loss | 36.63% (37/64) |
| 46.46% (223/257) | Sets Win/Loss | 38.50% (87/139) |
| 48.57% (2102/2226) | Games Win/Loss | 45.80% (1008/1193) |
| 49.46% (46/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 27.66% (13/34) |
| 41.84% (41/57) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.15% (24/28) |
| 39.13% (9/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 250 | Aces Total | 378 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 412 | Total Double Faults | 317 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:11:32 |
| 98.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 237.23 |
| 61% (3705/6108) | 1st Serve % | 64% (3087/4836) |
| 63% (2320/3705) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (2135/3087) |
| 45% (1073/2403) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (770/1749) |
| 42% (264/628) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (140/393) |
| 40% (2595/6429) | Return Points Win % | 35% (1678/4784) |
| 0.00% (0/16) | Challenger W/L | 27.27% (3/8) |
| 48.48% (96/102) | Futures W/L | 37.78% (34/56) |
| 45% (95/213) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 37% (37/100) |
| 41% (14/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (12/27) |
| 40% (21/53) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (12/24) |
| 80% (101/81) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (40/33) |
| 20% (101/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (40/6) |
| 13% (113/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (61/4) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
